Identity is adversarial. That changes everything.
Historical compute is valuable.
But identity + rewards + targeting is the most attacked surface in Web3.
Glyph is built for adversarial environments:
sybils creating fake “users”
low-quality growth manipulation
So Glyph’s outputs must be:
policy-driven and upgradeable
Glyph is not just “compute.”
It is governance of how trust is defined.
Privacy posture: optional vs default
Brevis: correctness-first
Brevis proves computation is correct. Privacy depends on how the app designs its circuit and what it reveals.
Glyph: privacy + consent by default
Glyph is designed so apps do not need raw histories.
Instead, apps consume minimal claims:
persona class (e.g., LP / trader / borrower)
score bucket (not raw score)
This is what makes Glyph viable for:
identity-based segmentation
without becoming a surveillance layer.
Who adopts each first (and why it matters)
Brevis adoption comes from: protocol mechanics
Brevis is infrastructure for:
hooks and contracts needing historical computation
Glyph adoption comes from: growth outcomes
Glyph is infrastructure for:
exchanges & onboarding funnels
campaigns, quests, incentive systems
any app burning budget on sybil waste and low-quality retention
The buyer logic is different.
Brevis is often “engineering ROI.”
Glyph is “growth + retention ROI.”